companies are relying more and more on psychometric tests公司招聘越来越依靠于心思查验

here is a?test. assign a score of 1 to 5, where 1 is “strongly agree” and 5 is “strongly disagree”, to the following statement: “i really care about my work.” if you have answered that kind of question before, you have probably applied for a job at a large company. psychometric t
ests, as they are called, have become increasingly popular.


eager job-seekers may think the answers to these questions are glaringly obvious. for any statement, give a response that creates a portrait of a diligent, collaborative worker. of course, applicants care about their work, love collaborating with other people and pay careful attention to detail.?


but the people who set the tests know that candidates will respond this way. so questions are?rephrased?in many different ways to check that applicants are consistent and make it difficult for them to remember what they have already said.


aptitude tests are not a new idea. intelligence tests have been around for a century and were popular with government departments. charles johnson, who has been involved in psychometric testing for 40 years and was responsible for constructing the tests used to recruit british civil servants, says the second world war had a big impact.?


the british were impressed with the efficiency of german army officers and learned they had been selected with the help of intelligence tests. this led the british to create the war office selection board. alongside verbal and non-verbal reasoning, it challenged candidates with word-association exercises and being made to lead group discussions.


for high-skilled jobs, these tests are useful. however, mr johnson says there is a risk with using such tests to recruit workers for low-skilled jobs. if you select people who pass?sophisticated?cognitive tests, they will learn the job quickly but will then get bored and leave.


psychometric tests became more popular from the 1970s onwards and are now seen as a useful way of sorting through the many candidates who apply for the jobs offered by big companies. “it is a?laborious?task to sort through thousands of written applications,” says julia knight, another occupational psychologist. “as well as being time consuming, it is not very effective and subject to bias.”


questions in such tests may ask a candidate to describe their behaviour in hypothetical situations: dealing with an angry customer, for example. the suggested answers may all be plausible (apologise?profusely, fetch a manager and so on), so there is no obviously “right” answer. nevertheless the aim is to build a profile of the candidate to see if they have the right character traits for the job.


people are generally judged on the basis of five characteristics with the?acronym?ocean for openness, conscientiousness,?extroversion?(or?introversion), agreeableness and neuroticism. the ideal characteristics can be surprising: it turns out that introverts are the best train-drivers as they seem to pay more attention to details such as safety procedures and can cope with spending long periods of their time on their own.


extroverts do not make the best call-centre employees because they can spend so much time chatting to customers that they don’t get much done. the most useful trait among such workers, according to steve fletcher, an occupational psychologist, is?assertiveness; this enables them to deal with more calls.




rephrase?[?ri??fre?z] vt. 改述;从头遣词sophisticated?[s??f?st?ke?t?d] adj. 凌乱的;精美的;久经圆滑的

laborious?[l??b??ri?s] adj. 勤劳的;艰苦的;吃力的

profusely?[pr??fju?sli] adv. 丰厚地

acronym?[??kr?n?m] n. 首字母缩略词

extroversion?[?ekstr??v??r?n] n. 外向性

introversion?[??ntr??v??r?n] n. 内向性

assertiveness?[??s??rt?vn?s] n. 气势;自傲


21考研qq群:749245763? ? 22考研qq群:1群779376497 快来一同寻找尽力考研小火伴

2021考研考前急救冲分包(向下领券免费听)(微博) ¥29.00

【2022考研】菜鸟备考方案——0元12课时 (6课时择校择业不苍茫+6课时英数抢先备考) ¥1.00



您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注